Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
03/19/2010 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB367 | |
HB206 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 367 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 206 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 206-HIGH SCHOOL ASSESSM'T/POSTSECONDARY CLASS CHAIR SEATON announced that the final order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 206, "An Act establishing a career assessment requirement in public schools; and relating to postsecondary courses for secondary school students." [Although not formally stated, HB 206, labeled 26-LS0765\S, Mischel/4/22/09 was before the committee.] 9:07:10 AM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER asked whether any amendments were on the table. CHAIR SEATON reported that Conceptual Amendment 7 was previously adopted by a vote of 5-2. 9:07:54 AM LES MORSE, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner, Department of Education and Early Development (DEED), asked to address questions surrounding the WorkKeys, discuss which grade level would be most appropriate for WorkKeys, discuss transcripts versus cumulative records, and make comments on the high school graduation qualifying exam. He raised the first issue, whether the qualifying exam should be given to in 11th or 12th grade. He offered his belief that it comes down to a question of whether the exam is for adults to assess which situation is best for a student's employment situation or for a student to prepare for what he/she chooses to do next. He said it seems to make sense to the department and the board that administering the test in 11th grade gives the student an opportunity to assess what he/she may wish to do differently in their 12th grade, prior to graduation. This would not prohibit students from retaking the test, but the requirement should lie in the 11th grade. Thus, it explains the DEED's position, since it allows the student to have information to change his/her behavior in their final year of high school. He suggested the qualifying exam may motivate the student in combination with an ACT or SAT exams. 9:09:54 AM CHAIR SEATON stated his intention is not to move the bill from committee. He related that if the information was going to be on the transcript, the text could be taken a second time. He asked for the cost, noting the Department of Labor & Workforce Development offers WorkKeys. He asked whether the school district could accept the WorkKeys if it was taken as a senior at the DLWD or if the exam must be administered through school. MR. MORSE said he was not certain. He offered to work with the DLWD and review any interdepartmental agreements. He commented that the department shares data with the DLWD. He assumed that the DEED would obtain the data from the DLWD and he was unsure if the mechanism was in place to do so. He offered his belief that students could retake the examination in the 12th grade if the mechanism was set in place. He recalled that the current regulations allow charging students for retaking the exam, although he thought the fees were low. He offered to research the issue and provide the information to the committee. CHAIR SEATON asked him to provide the current or projected fee for retaking the exam in the 12th grade. MR. MORSE agreed to provide the information. 9:12:17 AM MR. MORSE continued with an issue from the last hearing, transcripts versus cumulative records. He reported that all of the assessments that are statewide assessments require the results be placed in the "cum" [cumulative] record, which is a file of student performances during the school period. This collection provides background information for educators who are trying to determine how to assist a particular student. He related the cumulative record is different than a transcript, which is a summary of "one timeframe." The high school transcript is a summary record of all the high school courses taken, attendance, and includes the high school graduation qualifying exam (HSGQE) results. 9:13:31 AM MR. MORSE, in response to Representative Edgmon, explained that "cum" refers to the cumulative record during the school experience. 9:14:01 AM CHAIR SEATON recapped that the assessment would be on the high school transcript and the score of the high school graduation qualifying examination (HSGQE) would be on the transcript. MR. MORSE answered that currently the school district is required to place the HSGQE score as a "pass" or "no pass" which is the only assessment on the transcript. He stated that it is a burden to a school district, which is usually performed as a management recordkeeping system function that brings in the score to the student record. In further response to Chair Seaton, he clarified that the HSGQE is a "pass" or "did not pass" score, which is electronically listed. 9:15:17 AM REPRESENTATIVE KELLER asked if any indication of WorkKeys is on the diploma. 9:15:39 AM CHAIR SEATON recalled that the WorkKeys information is not on the diploma but is on the transcript. He referred to page 2, lines 13-14, "the assessment shall be displayed in summary form on the student's high school transcript." He asked whether an employer would use a transcript to know the level of student's preparedness. MR. MORSE offered that typically, if an employer wishes to see the student's performance, the transcript, as the universal tool, would provide that information. However, an employer could ask a student if he/she has taken the WorkKeys and if so, ask for the results. Additionally, the student could request the information from their high school from their "cum" record. He did not recall the timeframe, but thought the records are retained for 70 years. 9:18:51 AM MR. MORSE, in response to Chair Seaton, explained that a transcript is a one-page document. It tells the course taken and reflects the grade earned. He stated that most of the information fits on one page. The transcript is sent when a student, through the registrar, requests that a transcript be sent or by obtaining a certified copy of the transcript. Typically, the transcript is sent to a college or university. CHAIR SEATON suggested the committee would like the diploma to be more useful and accessible. It could be the transcript or the WorkKeys document could be forwarded to an employer as a separate item from the transcript. He offered his appreciation for any efforts to help the committee determine a better way to disseminate the information available to the employer. 9:20:43 AM REPRESENTATIVE KELLER asked for clarification on the summary form on the high school transcript. He assumed the school district would need to determine the content and the burden of providing the mechanism to obtain a full report. He said it seemed like it would raise the value of the transcript to have the WorkKeys summary listed, with a means to access additional information for the full WorkKeys transcript. MR. MORSE offered his view that summary information would provide the level achieved on each test. For example, in math the student would have attained a bronze, silver, or gold level. It may be possible to add a line to read, "Full record can be requested from Registrar's office," but the student would need to give permission, since that right is provided under the student's federal rights. He said he could speak to the cost, but school districts would need to obtain information on the programming costs. 9:22:41 AM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER thought the committee was making this matter more complicated than necessary. She suggested that a diploma means the student met the graduation requirements; a transcript lists grades, attendance records, and she anticipated that if the legislature adds WorkKeys, that the transcript would list the WorkKeys score level. She did not recall any employer or college ever needing more information than the transcript. 9:23:33 AM The committee took an at-ease from 9:23 a.m. to 9:42 a.m. as the fire alarm sounded and members left the building. 9:42:06 AM CHAIR SEATON brought the committee back to order. [Members present were Representatives Buch, Gardner, Edgmon, Munoz, and Seaton.] 9:42:38 AM MR. MORSE reported that he researched a prior question during the break, and according to regulations, if a student repeats the HSGQUE in their 12th grade and improves his/her score, there is not any charge for the examination. If not, the student could be charged by the school district. 9:43:13 AM MR. MORSE stated that the State Board of Education and Early Development supports keeping the HSGQE in place. The board would like to take a view of the comprehensive assessment system and accountability system and not change pieces at this time. He stated that the state must ensure its compliance at the federal level and some potential changes will occur in the next year or so. He cautioned that the state does not want to be out of "sync" with the federal requirements. The board's position is that the qualifying examination is accomplishing a goal of ensuring that students graduate with a minimum set of skills and recommends keeping the exam in place at this time, although some further work could be valuable. He remarked that it is important that the WorkKeys be a separate issue since the exams fulfill different purposes. The HSGQE tests the state's content standards. He referred to a document in members' packets titled "HSGQE Proficiency Descriptors and WorkKeys Skill Levels," although he related he did not want to cover this in detail. However, some skills are covered on one exam but not on the other exam. The examinations cover different things. He pointed out that the document describes the different levels of WorkKeys requirements. He offered his belief that WorkKeys can be an important test for information, but should not be used as a "high stakes individual student test." He said he would be reluctant to use the exam since the "high stakes" student test potentially may deny students a diploma and the vendor must use vendor rules. The state would not be able to devise state rules, particularly as it relates to accommodations. 9:46:06 AM MR. MORSE said he learned that "signing" is not allowed on the WorkKeys assessments although "signing" is allowed on all state- developed tests In response to Chair Seaton, he acknowledged that he was referring to the American Sign Language when he referred to "signing." He added that the presumption is that someone who cannot hear could read. 9:46:40 AM MR. MORSE related that WorkKeys assessments provide information, but he would not consider using it as a "high stakes" tool or any vendor product as a "high stakes" tool. He mentioned that another question was a request for analysis on certification levels and WorkKeys equivalent to the HSGQE. He related that the DEED attempted to compare students who took the WorkKeys in 11th grade to their 10th grade HSGQE's scores. The question was to examine how well students perform on the HSGQE relative to their WorkKeys level of Bronze, Silver, Gold, or Platinum. He suggested more students will provide more sophisticated analysis. So far, the school district has less than 390 students, which is not enough to make a judgment since the sample is too small. Generally, those students obtaining a silver or gold level or higher passed the HSGQE. Typically, some students achieving a bronze level did not pass the HSGQE. He explained that next year the whole student population will take the WorkKeys and the DEED will be able to provide better analysis. MR. MORSE, in response to Chair Seaton, related the DEED will have the data to easily be able to compare. In further response to Chair Seaton, he stated that a report could be provided to the committee. 9:49:00 AM MR. MORSE related that if the "high stakes" nature of the HSGQE was removed but WorkKeys content tested the same areas that one content test in WorkKeys is not given on the HSGQE. Currently, the DEED offers some subtests on reading comprehension and math, but the open-ended writing and grammar tests in the HSGQE are not covered in WorkKeys. He also related that some detailed skills are not tested that are on the standards. He stated that the state board could change their regulations to include all content areas. MR. MORSE commented that the original purpose of the HSGQE was to give graduates the basic skills. Since its inception in 2005, more students are graduating today. The state has gone from a 61.4 percent to 67.5 percent graduation rate. Additionally, the Special Education population group has improved from 39.6 to 43.6 percent. While more improvement is needed, some improvement has been made, he stated. 9:51:24 AM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER asked whether the HSGQE is the reason for the increase in graduates and it may be an incidental result. MR. MORSE acknowledged that the DEED has not performed a study to pinpoint the increase. He agreed that other improvements in the standards-based movement or other things could have impacted the graduation rate. However, if the rates had decreased, the department would consider whether the HSGQE was preventing some students from graduating. REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER offered her belief that testimony has been given that does show it prevents some students from graduating. She related that the "high stakes" refers to students who have otherwise met course requirements, but have not passed the HSGQE and cannot graduate. MR. MORSE reported that in the class of 2008, at 12th grade level, 270 students did not graduate since they did not pass the HSGQE, but met other requirements. In 2008, 1,926 12th grade students did not graduate, but passed all parts of HSGQE exam. In those instances, the local requirements interfered with graduation. The majority of those not graduating are actually passing the exam, he concluded. 9:54:04 AM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER related that the 1,976 may include students who decide they do not need to go to school since they passed the exam. MR. MORSE said he did not think it would apply to the specific population since most of the students passed the exam in 10th or 11th grade, but were still appearing in school in the 12th grade. He suggested he does not have any survey or data of the number of students who leave due to that reason. He offered his belief that number would be small. 9:54:58 AM MR. MORSE, in response to Chair Seaton, offered that these 270 students obtained a certificate of achievement, which means that they achieved the local requirements but did not pass the HSGQE. The 1,926 students did not receive anything since they needed to pass local requirements prior to graduation. He suggested those students may have returned and finished high school the next year. He pointed out that 69.1 percent of the 2,787 seniors did not graduate. Thus, the 1,926 students represent the 69.1 percent of the students who were seniors but did not graduate. CHAIR SEATON referred to that figure as the dropout population. He said it may not be the total figure since some students will return and graduate in their 5th year. He assumed the DEED has the identifying student number and will follow up to obtain an outcome. He asked him to provide the committee with the report. MR. MORSE agreed to do so. He said it is important to note that 30 percent of dropouts come back the next year. Some of them will drop out again. Nearly 20 percent of students have been in the dropout population two times. 9:57:22 AM REPRESENTATIVE BUCH said he was encouraged at the enhanced graduation rates. He recalled that the state has enhanced the investment. He said that some teachers have stated that the Special Education investment is huge. He asked for the percentage of investment for special education students since 2005. 9:58:55 AM MR. MORSE said he believed that the funding has increased for all students, as well as for the intensive special education students, who may never earn a diploma. He related that school districts are providing better education for all teachers on how to teach all students. He related a scenario in which 2 of 30 students in a classroom are special education students. He stated that the teacher training is more sophisticated on how to help those students. He related that this has improved due to technical assistance at the state and federal level. Additionally, it has improved due to the investment the legislature has made in education. REPRESENTATIVE BUCH said he is encouraged. He just wondered about the shift in funding since the legislature spends more funds on education. He did not disagree with the changes or shift, but expressed an interest in knowing the percentage. 10:00:33 AM REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked for an example of the HSGQE. MR. MORSE offered to provide an "item sampler" that would give feel for the items on a test. [HB 206 was held over.] 10:01:05 AM
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 367 Workdraft version E.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/19/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 367 |